Technical Efficiency among Smallholder Irrigators: Trends from Zimbabwe

PDF

Published: 2023-12-30

DOI: 10.56557/ajaas/2023/v6i128

Page: 85-94


Joseph Buteteh Chivizhe

Department of Agricultural Practice, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe.

Norman Mupaso *

Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Smallholder irrigation productivity has been a topical issue among researchers and policy makers in developing countries. The level of productivity has raised questions on whether smallholder irrigation is the most suitable model for agricultural development. The study was conducted at HamaMavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands Province of Zimbabwe. The aim of the study was to assess the level of technical efficiency and agricultural productivity in smallholder irrigated agriculture. The study used primary data collected from a randomly selected sample of 127 respondents. The sample comprised of 76 farmers from Ngondoma irrigation scheme and 51 farmers from HamaMavhaire irrigation scheme. The stochastic frontier production function was used to analyze the productivity and technical efficiency of the irrigation schemes. The study’s findings show that the average technical efficiency for Ngondoma irrigation scheme was 69%. This implies that there is a potential of increasing agricultural productivity by 31% using the existing irrigation technology. The findings also show that for the efficiency model, the statistically significant variables are; manure (P<0.01), farm size and irrigation water (P<0.05). The results for HamaMavhaire irrigation scheme show an average technical efficiency of 65%. This implies that there is a potential to increase agricultural productivity by 35% using the existing technology. The use of pesticides was statistically significant (P<0.01). The inefficiency model suggested that the statistically significant variables influencing agricultural productivity are years of schooling (P<0.01) and agricultural extension (P<0.05). The study concluded that there were potential gains to be realized by the farmers if technical efficiency of the smallholder irrigation schemes were to be improved.

Keywords: Agricultural productivity, technical efficiency, inefficiency model, ngondoma, hamamavhaire, smallholder irrigation scheme, technology


How to Cite

Chivizhe, Joseph Buteteh, and Norman Mupaso. 2023. “Technical Efficiency Among Smallholder Irrigators: Trends from Zimbabwe”. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences 6 (1):85-94. https://doi.org/10.56557/ajaas/2023/v6i128.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Malabo Montpellier Panel. Water-Wise: Smart irrigation strategies for Africa. Dakar, Senegal: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Malabo Montpellier Panel; 2018 Available:https://www.mamopanel.org/media/uploads/files/WaterWise_Smart_Irrigation_Strategies_for_Africa.pdf

Zhou Y. Smallholder subsistence agriculture, Sustainability and the Syngenta Foundation. Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture; 2010.

The World Bank Group. Water in Agriculture worldbank.org World Population (nd) unfp.org; 2020

UN. World population ageing. United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2009

Economic Commission for Africa. Greening Africa’s Industrialisation. Economic Report on Africa. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa; 2016.

Siebert S, Burke J, Faures JM, Frenken K, Hoogeveen J, Doll P, Portmann FT. Groundwater use for irrigation – A global inventory. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences; 2010.

UN. World urbanization prospects. Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2011

IFAD. Smallholders, food security and the environment. Indian High Commission (1903) Report of the Indian Irrigation Commission; 2011

FAO. Boosting food production in Africa’s “breadbasket areas”. New collaboration among Rome –based United Nations Agencies and Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) Rome FAO; 2008.

Mutambara A, AMunodawafa. Production challenges and sustainability of smallholder irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 2014;4(15).

Fanadzo M, Chiduza C, Mnkeni PNS. Overview of Smallholder irrigation Schemes in South Africa: Relationship between farmer crop management practices and performance. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;5(25);3514-3523

Van Averbeke W. Performance of smallholder irrigation schemes in the Vhembe District of South Africa. Problems, perspectives and challenges of agricultural water management. 2012, Mar 9;21:413-38.

Sinyolo S. Mudhara M, Wale E. The impact of smallholder irrigation on household welfare: The case of Tugela Ferry Irrigation Scheme in KwaZulu – Natal, South Africa; 2013.

OECD/FAO. “Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa; Prospectas and challenges for the next decade” in OECD /FAO Agricultural Outlook. 2016-2025, OECD Publishing, Paris; 2016.

Bahtay, Jordaan H, Sabastain G. Agricultural management practices and factors affecting technical efficiency in Zimbabwe maize farming. Agriculture; 2020. Available:www.mdpi.com/journal/agriculture

Wondimagegnhu BA, Bogale BA. Small-scale irrigation and its effect on food security of rural households in North-West Ethiopia: A comparative analysis. Ethiopian Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;13(1):31-51.

Jambo Y, Alemu A, Tasew W. Impact of small-scale irrigation on household food security: Evidence from Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security. 2021;10:21. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00294-w

DOI. History of smallholder irrigation development in Zimbabwe. Department of Irrigation; Ministry of Agriculture Mechanisation and Irrigation Development, Harare; 2011.

MoLAWD. Ministry of Lands Agriculture and Water Development, Zimbabwe; 2000

Mosello B, Oates N, Jobbins G. Pathways for irrigation development: Policies and irrigation performance in Zimbabwe. Panrpan Prise; 2017.

Tijani AA. Analysis of the technical efficiency of rice farms in Ijesha Land of Osun State, Nigeria, Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA). 2006;45(2):1-10.

Spate Irrigation Network. Strengthening Agricultural Water Efficiency and Productivity at the African and Global level GCP|INT|231|SWI FAO; 2015.

DOI:www.fao.org

Salman M, Pek, E, Fereres E, García-Vila M. Policy guide to improve water productivity in small- scale agriculture - The case of Burkina Faso, Morocco and Uganda. Rome, FAO; 2020. Available:https://doi.org/10.4060/CA7596EN

Froebrich, Jochem Eva Ludi, Sami Bouarfa, Dominique Rollin, Nebo Jovanovic, Maria Roble, Tarek Ajmi, Rami Albasha, Sékou Bah, Haithem Bahri, Gonzalo Barberá, Christy van Beek, Bruno Cheviron, Benson Chishala, Willem de Clercq, Yacouba Coulibaly, Mohammed Dicko, Bandiougou Diawara, Aleksandra Dolinska, Raphaëlle Ducrot, Teklu Erkossa, Sebastiao Famba, Degol Fissahaye, Angel De Miguel Garcia, Solomon Habtu, Salia Hanafi, Julia Harper, Hanneke Heesmans, Jean‐Yves Jamin, Kees van't Klooster, Nathaniel Mason, Jean-Claude Mailhol, Serge Marlet, Insaf Mekki, Constansia Musvoto, Beatrice Mosello, Alice Mweetwa, Naomi Oates, Elijah Phiri, Ludivine Pradeleix, Erik Querner, Andrei Rozanov, Philippe Ker Rault, Jean‐Emmanuel Rougier, Chizumba Shepande, Maite Sánchez Reparaz, Bréhima Tangara, Joris De Vente, Marlene de Witt, Cai Xueliang, Abdelaziz Zairi. Transdisciplinary innovation in irrigated small holder agriculture in Africa Special Issue Paper. Irrigation and Drainage; 2020.

Essilfie FL, Asiamah MT, Nimoh F. Estimation of farm level technical efficiency in small scale maize production in the Mfatseman Municipality in the Central Region of Ghana: A Stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics. 2011;3(14):645– 654. ISSN 2006-9774@2011 Academic Journals

Malaysian Productivity Cooperation. Challenging the Frontier, Empowering People. 23rd MPC Productivity Report 2015/2016; 2016.

Ladvenicová J, Miklovičová S. The relationship between farm size and productivity in Slovakia. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development. 2015;4(2):46-50.

Ali DA, Deininger K. Is there a farm size–productivity relationship in African agriculture? Evidence from Rwanda. Land Economics. 2015, May 1;91(2):317-43.

Irmak S, Rathje WR. Plant Growth and yield as affected by wet soil conditions due to flooding and over – irrigation University of Nebraska – lincoln extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; 2008.

Botts B. Too much water is as harmful to the plants as not getting enough. Chikago Tribune; 2015.

Dinye RD, Ayitio J. Irrigated Agricultural Production in Northern Ghana: A case study of the Tono Irrigation Scheme in the Kassena Nankana District International Journal of Water Resources and Environment Engineering. 2013;5(2):119–133

Sinha B, Biswas I. Potential of Bio pesticides in Indian agriculture vis-a-vis Rural Development. India Science and Technology; 2008.

Africa Union. Maputo Declaration on Agriculture and Food Security. NEPAD. Comrehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme; 2003.